As the title of this article alludes to in a tongue-in-cheek manner, the people of Iran have struggled between a murderous war with their Iraqi neighbors and a pervasive religious oppression from within their own government. Faced with a choice between two unsatisfactory options for existence and no means of affecting either, it’s no surprise that any opportunity for even the smallest “escape” takes on significant meaning. In Nafisi’s book, the only “escape” possible for her and her female students was to meet privately to discuss the parallels between the world of characters from literature, and the young Iranian women seeking intellectual refuge from a male-dominated Islamic state.
To be honest, I was skeptical about the book at first even though I have had some knowledge of the plight of women in under strict Sharia Islamic Law. For women, it spells certain doom to individualism and creative expression. Basic freedoms go out the window. I simply could not imagine how such a premise for a book, especially one based on the memoirs of an Iranian scholar, could be fulfilling to a Westerner who’s life might be turned upside-down by the actions of a state-sponsored terrorist from Iran. At best I expected a self-pitying and depressing read about the brutal oppressiveness of Sharia Law from a women’s perspective. What I got was an entertaining and eye-opening discovery that we are more alike than different.
The book’s narrative is not always an easy or likeable read given it episodic structure. It tends to be non-linear, and I prefer a more linear narrative. But it doesn’t take long to become immersed in Nafisi’s world as she paints such a vivid picture of her transformed post-revolutionary home. As one reads on, one discovers a very personal evocation of a woman's complex, terrifying, and often contradicting experience during a very challenging time in Iranian history. It’s fascinating to witness how Nafisi is only able to survive the intellectually stifling rituals of her society through private studies of banned literally classics with other women. Interestingly, one doesn’t feel as though one has just read a book about Iran, but has actually “met” a very unique and surprisingly Westernized Iranian woman.
Nafisi's book paints a dark but compelling portrait of the most turbulent period for Iran's history by a person from a privileged position. She cleverly reflects on her private lessons to groups of young women about literary classic such as The Great Gatsby and Lolita while sipping cups of tea as though chatting in a New York literature club. Meanwhile, the professor’s lessons also reflect on life in Teheran following Khomeini's religious revolution where a woman must hide her bodies from head to toe - or face severe punishment. She also interjects many key moments in recent Iranian history such as the troubles at Tehran University, the destruction of "dangerous" books, and even the mass funeral of the late Ayatollah Khomeini that Nafisi describes with documentary-like clarity.
Although Reading Lolita in Tehran isn’t quite a masterpiece, in my opinion, it has been one of the most inspiring and heartfelt books I have had the pleasure of reading in a long while. I would highly recommend it to anyone with an open-mind.
JM

I can definitely agree with you that this book was surprising. It was first of a surprising reading to have assigned in an English class. I would have expected to be reading something more wester (possibly one of the books that Nafisi discusses). However, I can now see that this book does fit into the class. You say you recommend this book to anyone with an open mind, I think that's the point. Since the purpose of this class is "critical thinking" a book that causes us to open our minds fits right in. I'm glad that you spotted the non-linear structure of this book. I don't think I have made up my mind if I prefer linear or non-linear books. Most books I have read are linear, but books such as Slaughterhouse Five by Kurt Vonnegut with its bizarre non-linear structure have had a big impression on me too. I wonder if there are any cultural implications to whether or not stories are told in a non-linear or linear format. I have to wonder if other societies prefer non-linear storytelling, or if linear sotrytelling is the form of storytelling that is standard to people worldwide. Also does it take someone more organized to write in a non-linear fashion or develop out of a more disorganized personality. I remember reading that Kurt Vonnegut planned out his story lines for Slaughterhouse Five on a toilet paper roll using different colored crayons. Anyways, great post! I really think you had a good grasp on this book an some very great insights. I can't wait to read your next blog (with an open mind of course).
ReplyDelete: ) Ben Andrews